deviantART

 

A couple of thoughts on editing.

Fri May 9, 2008, 8:29 AM
I was messing around with sharpening today, and had this dilemma of (imagine this said whilst moving the slider backwards and forwards) "Oh no, too harsh! Damn, not sharp enough!". Then I had an idea that should have been obvious. Duplicate the background layer, do lots of sharpening on that, then blend it with the original by reducing the opacity to about 40 or 50%. The unsharpened original seems to make the effect less harsh, whilst still allowing it to look pretty sharp. Hooray!

Something else too... I've found using LAB mode (as opposed to RGB) really useful for certain things. Mostly curves. In RGB, increasing the contrast (which I usually do with curves) also increases the colour saturation, and you might not want that. In LAB mode, you can edit the 'lightness' curve separately, so that decouples contrast from saturation. Again, hooray! This might be useful if you've already edited the saturation to your satisfaction, but want to adjust the contrast again.

Also, how I usually increase saturation these days is done using LAB mode. I create a new curves adjustment layer, and edit the 'a' and 'b' channels by moving the black and white points inward by the same amount on each. You have to do it symmetrically otherwise the colour balance gets screwed up. I generally move them inwards to -80 and +80, depending on the image. Then just adjust the fill opacity of the curves layer to how you want it.

If any colours are left a bit too bright, it's easy to adjust them downward using the saturation tool as you usually would. This is generally a problem with yellows.

Anyway, I hope someone finds all this interesting or useful!



Clubs:

:iconhdr-club: :iconmountainshots: :icontreeswithcharacter:

  • Mood: Compassion
  • Listening to: Queen
  • Watching: Pushing Daisies
  • Eating: too much
  • Drinking: green tea

Devious Comments

love 0 0 joy 0 0 wow 0 0 mad 0 0 sad 0 0 fear 0 0 neutral 0 0

Interesting. Your first par describes exactly the process I go through when sharpening. The rest is new to me, but I may give it a go :)

--
Read my column, my poetry, interviews and short stories at AidanSemmens.co.uk
I should have thought of that sharpening trick ages ago... To be specific, I use radius 0.3, amount 150 (or whatever seems to work), then blend it as I described.

--
My gallery
I tend to rely on the whatever-seems-to-work, make-it-up-as-you-go-along principle each time, which is probably very inefficient of me - but my default is radius 2 (never as low as your 0.3), amount 100; I sometimes go as high as 200 or even 300 if I fancy a comicbook look, but that's usually for my own eyes only :D

--
Read my column, my poetry, interviews and short stories at AidanSemmens.co.uk
I've heard people doing similar tricks to that sharpening one in a number of ways - I've yet to try blending two layers with opacity like that, but it sounds useful, should probably give it a try!

As to the other stuff, I'm sceptical about the need to go through the trouble of editing saturation in LAB-mode, because I generally edit vibrance (and contrast) when importing my original RAW-image. The RAW tool in fact takes care of most of the processing, very often I find that editing curves is unnecessary after that.

--
Philosopher, Photographer, Procrastinator.
More photos and other content at [link]
Founder of =MountainShots
yes, this is very useful, cheers man!

--
I believe in fate...as a worthy adversary.
Ah, I don't do much of the editing in Camera RAW, I feel it doesn't give me as much selective control over things as editing in PS. Your way will definitely be quicker though!

--
My gallery
Wow, radius 2! I use 0.3 because I feel I lose some detail otherwise.

--
My gallery
Interesting. I usually don't sharpen my pictures but I'll definitely give it a try.

--
"Cherish forever what makes you unique, ‘cuz you're really a yawn if it goes."
-Bette Midler-

Shoutbox

=Svision:iconSvision:
:boogie: B-)
Sun May 17, 2009, 12:22 PM
=yanni-must-die:iconyanni-must-die:
:blowkiss:
Wed Oct 15, 2008, 12:17 PM
*drewyboy:icondrewyboy:
:hug:
Thu Aug 14, 2008, 10:03 PM
=ich-liebe-dich:iconich-liebe-dich:
:poke:
Fri Apr 25, 2008, 9:18 PM
~Creativeness:iconCreativeness:
:wave:
Thu Feb 21, 2008, 5:46 PM
=yanni-must-die:iconyanni-must-die:
:w00t: Nice job!
Tue Jan 29, 2008, 3:08 PM

Forum

There are no threads yet!

Have you ever tried using film?

30%
23 deviants said It has its place .
29%
22 deviants said Yes, it was great! (and I also like vinyl and VHS).
16%
12 deviants said No. Just no, alright?
10%
8 deviants said Yes, it sucked.
9%
7 deviants said Film has been rendered obsolete. You will be assimilated!
6%
5 deviants said What's film?

Site Map